History
  • No items yet
midpage
Randolph v. Barbour
1821 U.S. LEXIS 348
| SCOTUS | 1821
|
Check Treatment
19 U.S. 128 (1821)
6 Wheat. 128

RANDOLPH et al.
v.
BARBOUR et al.

Supreme Court of United States.

February 12, 1821.

Mr. B. Hardin, for the respondents.

The COURT, stated that the case was within the spirit of the 20th rule of Court, although that rule applied, in terms, only to writs of error.

Motion granted.

ORDER. — A certificate, from the Clerk of the Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky, stating that an appeal had been taken in this case in May term, 1819, from the decree of the said Circuit Court, having been produced and filed, and it appearing that the record in said cause has not been filed on motion of Mr. Hardin, of counsel for the respondents, it is ordered, that the said appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed.[a]

NOTES

[a] Vide new rule of Court of the present term. Ante. Rule XXXII.

Case Details

Case Name: Randolph v. Barbour
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Feb 12, 1821
Citation: 1821 U.S. LEXIS 348
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.