History
  • No items yet
midpage
Randles v. Randles
39 Ind. 555
Ind.
1872
Check Treatment
Downey, J.

The only question made in this case is as to the sufficiency of the complaint. It is as follows-:

"The State of Indiana, Tippecanoe County, ss. In the Common Pleas Court.- To the November term, 1869.

W. D. Lee and P. H. Lee, for appellant. W. C. Wilson, for appellee.

“ Peter Randles, plaintiff, complains of Benjamin Randles, defendant, and says that the defendant, on the-day of -, by his note, a copy of which is filed herewith,' promised to pay Peter Randles - dollars and - cents, which remains unpaid; and the plaintiff claims judgment for five hundred dollars. Other relief.

“W. C. Wilson, Attorney for Plaintiff.”

Neither the note nor a copy of it was filed with the complaint.

We think the complaint was insufficient.

The judgment is reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Randles v. Randles
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: May 15, 1872
Citation: 39 Ind. 555
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.