Randisi v. Household Finance Corp.

269 A.D. 975 | N.Y. App. Div. | 1945

Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

(dissenting). In our opinion, section 358 of the Banking Law does not purport to declare a loan void merely because a statement furnished pursuant to section 353, by inadvertent error incorrectly states the date of maturity.

The error herein was clearly inadvertent, and the order should be reversed, the complaint dismissed and defendant Household Finance Corporation awarded judgment m the consolidated action.

Martin, P. J., Townleyand Dore, JJ., concur in decision; Cohn and Callahan, JJ., dissent in opinion.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. (Reich v. Railroad Employees’ Personal Loan Co., 291 N. Y. 714.)

Case Details

Case Name: Randisi v. Household Finance Corp.

Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date Published: Nov 16, 1945

Citation: 269 A.D. 975

Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.