History
  • No items yet
midpage
Randall v. State
352 So. 2d 566
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1977
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed. The judgment and sentence of the court, while indicating the appellant was to receive credit for all time served in jail, does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section *567921.161(1) Florida Statutes. Smith v. State, 310 So.2d 770 (Fla.2d DCA 1975).

Remanded for correction of the sentence; otherwise affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Randall v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Nov 30, 1977
Citation: 352 So. 2d 566
Docket Number: No. 77-851
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.