midpage

Rand v. StateRand v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Nov 15, 1900
Reporters:
Before:
Sharpe
SHARPE, J.

Under the principles declared in Jones v. State, 67 Ala. 84, and reaffirmed in Parker v. State, 77 Ala. 47, it must be held that no error was committed in the exclusion of testimony offered in behalf of defendant.

The evidence if entitled to be believed, proved every act essential to establish the defendant’s guilt. Therefore, the giving of the charge requested by the State was not erroneous.

No error appearing in the record, the judgment must be affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Rand v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Nov 15, 1900
Citation: 129 Ala. 119
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
Log In