204 P. 251 | Cal. Ct. App. | 1921
Judgment went for petitioners on an application for the issuance of a writ of mandate and defendants appeal.
Appellants, directors of the Cardiff Irrigation District, adopted a certain ordinance. Respondents by this proceeding sought to compel them to pass a second ordinance repealing the first, alleging in the petition that the first was passed with a fraudulent intent to accomplish an unlawful object. If we grant the existence of the fraud for the purpose only of laying a foundation for a disposition of the appeal, we can see no ground upon which respondents were entitled to judgment. It is provided, looking to so much of the statute as by any possibility could be imagined to apply to the present controversy, that the writ of mandate will issue "to compel the performance of an act which the law specially enjoins" (Code Civ. Proc., sec.
Judgment reversed.
*7Finlayson, P. J., and Craig, J., concurred.