History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rampart Capital Corp. v. Abke
1 S.W.3d 107
Tex.
1999
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Petition for Review Denied.






Lead Opinion

Justice HECHT, joined by Justice OWEN,

dissenting from the denial of the petition for review.

I respectfully dissent from the Court’s denial of the petition for review. This is a suit on a promissory note against a limited partner in circumstances described in Rampart Capital Corporation v. Maguire, 974 S.W.2d 195 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1998, pet. denied). In an unpublished opinion essentially identical to its opinion in Maguire, a divided court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of the action for want of prosecution. As in Maguire, I would grant Rampart’s petition, reverse the judgment of the court of appeals, and remand the case for further proceedings. Rampart Capital Corp. v. Maguire, 1 S.W.3d 106 (Tex.1999) (Hecht, J., dissenting).






Dissenting Opinion

I respectfully dissent from the Court's denial of the petition for review. This is a suit on a promissory note against a limited partner in circumstances described in Rampart Capital Corporationv. Maguire, 974 S.W.2d 195 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1998, pet. denied). In an unpublished opinion essentially identical to its opinion in Maguire, a divided court of appeals affirmed the trial court's dismissal of the action for want of prosecution. As inMaguire, I would grant Rampart's petition, reverse the judgment of the court of appeals, and remand the case for further proceedings. Rampart Capital Corp. v. Maguire, 1 S.W.2d 106 (Tex. 1999) (Hecht, J., dissenting).

Case Details

Case Name: Rampart Capital Corp. v. Abke
Court Name: Texas Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1999
Citation: 1 S.W.3d 107
Docket Number: No. 98-0552
Court Abbreviation: Tex.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.