Ramon v. Casellas

Nov 24, 1998
98-20525
Versions:165 F.3d 23
1998 WL 870318

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 97-CV-1842

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant, Joe B. Ramon appeals the district court‘s order denying his motion for reconsideration. We review the district court‘s denial of a motion for reconsideration under an abuse of discretion standard. See Midland West Corp. v. F.D.I.C., 911 F.2d 1141, 1145 n. 4 (5th Cir. 1990)(Rule 59(e) motion); Williams v. Brown & Root, Inc., 828 F.2d 325, 328 (5th Cir. 1987)(Rule 60(b) motion). We find that through the exercise of reasonable diligence, Ramon could have prosecuted his case; therefore, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

AFFIRMED.

Notes

*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR R. 47.5.4.