History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ramirez v. Santos
110 F. App'x 40
9th Cir.
2004
Check Treatment
Docket

MEMORANDUM **

Oregon state prisoner Arturo Ramirez appeals the district court’s order denying his application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Ramirez argues that he was deprived of the constitutionally-required effective assistance of counsel during his sentencing after his conviction of murder because his counsel failed adequately to investigate and to marshal evidence that Ramirez was a juvenile at the time of the crime. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm for the reasons stated by United States Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin in his Findings and Recommendation of May 5, 2003, which were adopted by the district court in its Order of June 18, 2003.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case Details

Case Name: Ramirez v. Santos
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Sep 17, 2004
Citation: 110 F. App'x 40
Docket Number: No. 03-35585
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.