No. 87-2018 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Mar 15, 1988

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Stolzenberg v. Forte Towers South, Inc., 430 So. 2d 558" date_filed="1983-05-03" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." case_name="Stolzenberg v. Forte Towers South, Inc.">430 So.2d 558 (Fla.3d DCA 1983); Bank of Miami v. Armenteros, 382 So. 2d 1336" date_filed="1980-04-29" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." case_name="Bank of Miami v. Armenteros">382 So.2d 1336 (Fla.3d DCA 1980); Burns v. Grubbs Constr., Inc., 174 So. 2d 476" date_filed="1965-04-27" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." case_name="Burns v. Grubbs Construction, Inc.">174 So.2d 476 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965); see also Peacock Constr. Co. v. Modern Air Conditioning, Inc., 353 So. 2d 840" date_filed="1977-12-15" court="Fla." case_name="Peacock Const. Co., Inc. v. Modern Air Conditioning, Inc.">353 So.2d 840 (Fla.1977) (payment by owner to general contractor is not, ordinarily, a condition precedent to general contractor’s duty to pay subcontractor).

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.