Ralls v. Ober
3:25-cv-00590
E.D. Va.Jan 8, 2026Check TreatmentDocket
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
TEX A. RALLS, II,
Plaintiff,
Vv. Civil Action No. 3:25ev590
PETER OBER,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Plaintiff, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983action. In order to state a viable claim under42 U.S.C. § 1983
, a plaintiff must allege that a person acting under color of state law deprived him or her of a constitutional right or of a right conferred by a law of the United States. See Dowe v. Total Action Against Poverty in Roanoke Valley,145 F.3d 653, 658
(4th Cir. 1998) (citing42 U.S.C. § 1983
). In his current Complaint, Plaintiff does not identify the particular constitutional right that was violated by the defendant’s conduct. Plaintiff's current allegations also fail to provide each defendant with fair notice of the facts and legal basis upon which his or her liability rests. See Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly,550 U.S. 544, 555
(2007) (quoting Conley v. Gibson,355 U.S. 41, 47
(1957)).
Accordingly, by Memorandum Order entered on November 19, 2025, the Court directed Plaintiff
to submit a particularized complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof.
(ECF No. 9.) The Court warned Plaintiff that the failure to submit a particularized complaint
would result in the dismissal of the action.
More than thirty (30) days have elapsed since the entry of the November 19, 2025
Memorandum Order. Plaintiff failed to submit a particularized complaint or otherwise respond
to the November 19, 2025 Memorandum Order. Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
An appropriate Final Order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion.
{ s/
Date: }| iS] QORXLe M. Hannah Rau
Richmond, Virginia Chief United State$ District Judge