1. This Court certified three questions to the Supreme Court. Because the answer to the first question was controlling, the remaining questions were not answered.
2. The headnote of the decision of the Supreme Court reads: "Where an affidavit under the Code, § 61-301, alleging one ground for dispossessing a tenant, is followed by the words `or and' and then another ground, it is not a positive allegation of either ground, and is subject to an oral motion to dismiss." *Page 137
3. In the body of the opinion of the Supreme Court, written by Presiding Justice Duckworth, it is said: "In Brafman Son
v. Asher, supra, [
4. For the full decision of the Supreme Court and the material facts in the case, see Ralls v. E. R. Taylor Auto Co.,
202 Ga. ___ (
5. Under the ruling of the Supreme Court, the trial judge erred in overruling an oral motion to dismiss the proceedings on the ground that such affidavit was made in the disjunctive and did not positively aver what ground or grounds were relied upon to dispossess the tenant.
Judgment reversed. Gardner and Townsend, JJ.,concur.
