Raley v. Ohio, No. 306

No. 306 | SCOTUS | Jun 24, 1957

Per Curiam:

The judgment of the Supreme Court of Ohio is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in the light of Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U.S. 234" date_filed="1957-06-17" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Sweezy v. New Hampshire Ex Rel. Wyman">354 U. S. 234, and Watkins v. United States, 354 U.S. 178" date_filed="1957-06-17" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Watkins v. United States">354 U. S. 178.

Mr. Justice Burton would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument. Mr. Justice Clark dissents from this disposition of the case for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinions in Sweezy v. New Hampshire and Watkins v. United States, supra.