History
  • No items yet
midpage
Raines v. State
198 S.E. 126
Ga. Ct. App.
1938
Check Treatment
Broyles, C. J.

The accused was convicted of the offense of knowingly possessing apparatus for the distilling of intoxicating liquors. It appears from the bill of exceptions' and the transcript of the record that the motion for new trial was overruled on March 21, 1938; and the bill of exceptions states that it was presented to the judge on “the 13th day of April, 1938, and within the time prescribed by law.” The statement that the bill of exceptions was presented “within the time prescribed by law” is contradicted by the preceding statement that it was presented on “the 13th day of April, 1938.” Coker v. Life &c. Ins. Co., 180 Ga. 525 (179 S. E. 626). It not affirmatively appearing that the bill of exceptions was presented within the time required by law (within twenty days from the date of the overruling of the motion for new trial), the writ of error must be

Dismissed.

MacIntyre and Querry, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Raines v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jul 2, 1938
Citation: 198 S.E. 126
Docket Number: 26993
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.