History
  • No items yet
midpage
Railway Labor Executives Association v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co., Intervenors
929 F.2d 742
D.C. Cir.
1991
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of intervenors’ petition for rehearing filed October 12,1989, and of the supplemental memorandum in support thereof filed March 27, 1991, it is

ORDERED by the court that inter-venors’ petition for rehearing be denied. Intervenors’ suggestion that the court’s opinion of August 29, 1989 (883 F.2d 1079) be modified in light of the Supreme Court's recent decision in Norfolk & Western Ry. v. American Train Dispatchers Ass’n, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 1156, 113 L.Ed.2d 95 (1991), is granted as follows:

At 883 F.2d at 1082, delete the second full paragraph beginning “Our recent decision in Brotherhood of Railway Carmen....”, as well as the introductory phrase of the third paragraph, “Although that issue is squarely presented here, we find it inappropriate to consider the question because”. Insert the following introductory phrase at the beginning of the third paragraph: “We find, however, that”.

Case Details

Case Name: Railway Labor Executives Association v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co., Intervenors
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Apr 11, 1991
Citation: 929 F.2d 742
Docket Number: 88-1391
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In