History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rafferty v. Schatzman
81 N.J. Super. 64
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
1963
Check Treatment
81 N.J. Super. 64 (1963)
194 A.2d 591

JAMES S. RAFFERTY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
FRANK D. SCHATZMAN, COUNTY CLERK OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY; PETER BIRO, CHAIRMAN OF BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY; AND FRANK D. SCHATZMAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND MIDDLESEX DEMOCRATIC COUNTY COMMITTEE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 28, 1963.
Decided October 28, 1963.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, KILKENNY and COLLESTER.

Mr. John J. Rafferty argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Warren W. Wilentz argued the cause for respondents Schatzman and Biro.

Mr. John A. Lynch appeared for respondent Middlesex Democratic County Committee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated in the opinion filed by Judge HALPERN, 81 N.J. Super. 58 (Law Div. 1963). We consider the statute, N.J.S.A. 19:27-11, as completely controlling.

Case Details

Case Name: Rafferty v. Schatzman
Court Name: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Date Published: Oct 28, 1963
Citation: 81 N.J. Super. 64
Court Abbreviation: N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.