Rachels v. Pepoon
104 N.J.L. 183 | N.J. | 1927
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Teenchabd, 'Kalisch, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Yan Buseiee, McGusisnsroisr, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 10.
For reversal — White, J. 1.
