| N.J. | Oct 17, 1927
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Teenchabd, 'Kalisch, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Yan Buseiee, McGusisnsroisr, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 10.
For reversal — White, J. 1.