Rachels v. Pepoon
104 N.J.L. 183
N.J.
1927
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Teenchabd, 'Kalisch, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Yan Buseiee, McGusisnsroisr, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 10.

For reversal — White, J. 1.