History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rabitte v. Nathan
22 Minn. 266
Minn.
1876
Check Treatment
Gileillan, C. J.

This case came into the district court upon an appeal from a decree of the probate court of Scott county. The appellant here made a motion in the district court to dismiss the appeal to that court, and from the *267order denying that motion appealed to this court. Here the respondent moves to dismiss that appeal.

The effect of the order appealed from was merely to retain the cause in the district court for trial and determination. It does not come within the third sub-division of Gen. St. ch. 86, § 8, which gives an appeal “ from an order involving the merits of the action, or some part thereof,” nor within the fifth sub-division of that section, which gives an appeal “ from an order which in effect determines the action, and prevents a judgment from which an appeal might be taken.” The order did not involve any part of the merits of the action, nor did it determine the action; on the contrary, it was a refusal to determine it in that way.

Appeal dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Rabitte v. Nathan
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Nov 11, 1876
Citation: 22 Minn. 266
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.