History
  • No items yet
midpage
Quinn v. Scheu
678 P.2d 781
Or. Ct. App.
1984
Check Treatment
BUTTLER, P. J.

Plaintiffs have petitioned for reconsideration of our opinion, 66 Or App 644, 675 P2d 1078 (1984), pointing out, inter alia, that we stated erroneously that it is undisputed that they made an initial payment of $2,000 to Paramount. They are correct in pointing out that that fact was disputed. That factual error, however, does not change our opinion, because it remains undisputed that plaintiffs visited the Paramount plant on at least one occasion and were aware that some of the work on the books was being done by Paramount.

Petition for reconsideration allowed; former opinion adhered to as modified herein.

Case Details

Case Name: Quinn v. Scheu
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Apr 4, 1984
Citation: 678 P.2d 781
Docket Number: A8012-07087; CA A25507
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.