History
  • No items yet
midpage
Quinlan v. Packard-Bell Co.
106 Cal. App. 2d 829
Cal. Ct. App.
1951
Check Treatment
McCOMB, J.

It has been stipulated that the decision in Marshall v. Packard-Bell, No. 18411 (ante, p. 770 [236 P.2d 201]), shall be controlling in the above-entitled case. Since we have this day filed a decision affirming the judgment in Marshall v. Packard-Bell, it is ordered that the judgment in the instant ease be affirmed.

Moore, P. J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing was denied November 1,1951, and appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied December 13, 1951.

Case Details

Case Name: Quinlan v. Packard-Bell Co.
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Oct 15, 1951
Citation: 106 Cal. App. 2d 829
Docket Number: Civ. No. 18412
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.