midpage

Quince v. StateQuince v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Jul 24, 1985
No. 85-578
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Dell

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence in all respects, except that we ‍‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​‍find the trial court erred in assessing costs against appellant, who had been adjudicated indigent, without notice and an opportunity to be heard, contrary to Jenkins v. ‍‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​‍State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we strike from the judgment that portion thereof which orders the payment of $15.00 pursuant to Section 960.20, Florida Statutes (1983) and court ‍‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​‍costs of $2.00.

HERSEY, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.





Rehearing

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellee’s motion for rehearing to note only that our decision in Quince ‍‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​‍v. State, 10 F.L.W. 1795 (Fla. 4th DCA July 24, 1985), does not prevent the state from attempting to tax costs against appellant in accordance with the ‍‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​‍procedure outlined in Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984).

HERSEY, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Quince v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jul 24, 1985
Citations: 475 So. 2d 916; 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2283; 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16139; No. 85-578
Docket Number: No. 85-578
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In