Quigg v. Radel

Jul 19, 1923
Reporters:
,
Per Curiam.

In this case the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Ellis and ‍‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‍Mr. Justice Browne are of opinion that the final order herein, discharging the petitioner in habeas corpus proceedings, should be affirmed, while Mr. Justice ‍‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‍Whitfield, Mr. Justice West and Mr. Justice Terrell are of opinion that the final order’ should be reversed; and there being no ‍‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‍prospect of a change of judicial opinion, the judgment should be affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. ‍‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‍224, 37 South Rep. 51, and Pensacola Electric Co. v. Humphreys, 61 Fla. 389, 54 South. Rep. 452.

An order will be entered affirming the ‍‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‍final order to which the writ of error herein was taken.