26 Pa. Commw. 611 | Pa. Commw. Ct. | 1976
Opinion by
Herman Quartz (Appellant) appeals to this Court an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which affirmed a referee’s decision denying benefits to Appellant pursuant to Section 402(b)(1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law).
Appellant was last employed by Don Hughes Ford Sales as. a mechanic. Following a conversation between Appellant and Don Hughes, who had retired from the management of the company, Appellant stopped work, and now contends that at the conclusion of the dialogue, Hughes fired him.
Order
And Now, this 20th day of October, 1976, the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review is hereby affirmed.
Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937), as amended, 43 P.S. §802(b) (1).
Furthermore, in a dialogue between the referee and employer’s representative, the employer indicated the Appellant could come back to work. When the referee told Appellant, “You should ask for your job back . . . ,” Appellant answered, “No way.”