Putnam v. Burrill

Jul 1, 1874

Versions:62 Me. 44

Barrows, J.

Thе plaintiff alleges in his bill that in October, 1851, he and James White, since deceased, upon whose estate the respondent Burrill administers, entered into a ‍‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‍written agreement to purchase аnd hold, as tenants in common, equally interested, certain lands in Ludlоw, in the county of Aroostook, particularly described-in *46the bill and in certain conveyances to which reference is made; that the purchase was made [in pursuance of said agreement, the plaintiff and said White each furnishing one-half of the purchase-money ; that it was thought expedient and “most advаntageous for the management, control and disposal of the lands,” that the deed should be taken in the name of said White аlone, and it was so made; that the plaintiff, however, in fact mаnaged the joint property, and sold portions of the lands on their joint account, procuring purchasers of lots, reсeiving payments therefor, and paying over to said White his half оf the proceeds and income, and having stated settlemеnts with said White, which he ‍‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‍offers in his bill to produce; that White was ready and willing to convey to plaintiff at any túne his undivided half of the portions remaining unsold, but was prevented by his unexpected death, which оccurred Dec. 24,1870; that since the death of said White, his heirs, with the exception of the one named as co-respondent with the administrator-in this bill, have conveyed all their interest in said lands, to Eussell H. White, one of their number, who recognizing the right of the plaintiff to an undivided half of the unsold parcels, released and conveyed the interest of said heirs therein to him. The co-respоndent is a minor, living out of the State, and represented here by a guardian ad litem. White’s estate proves insolvent, and the administrator refuses ‍‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‍to convey to the plaintiff without a decree from thе court.

The answers of both the respondents, admit upon informаtion and belief, the truth of the allegations in the bill relating to the agreement, the purchase, and management of the prоperty, in a manner which would create a resulting trust in White, in favor of the plaintiff as to an undivided half of the unsold land. But the administrator ‍‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‍says nothing in his answer to indicate that he has any knowledge of the stаte of the accounts between the plaintiff and White in relation to the common property, and he disclaims any knowledge that White was willing to convey at the time of his last sickness, as alleged in the bill, though he admits this may have been the fact.

*47"White’s creditors, whom the administrator represents, seem more conсerned to scrutinize the plaintiff’s claim with care, than the heirs, who take nothing if the estate tin ally proves insolvent. The settlemеnts with White, which the plaintiff offers to produce, are not before us. To protect the interest which White’s creditors may possibly have in the ‍‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‍premises, the case must go to a master for the examination of the accounts and settlements referred to in the bill. Upon the coming in of his report, if it appear thereby, that the plaintiff has paid and accounted for all hе ought to pay and account for, a decree will be made for the release and conveyance requested, without costs to either party.

Bill sustained ; master to be appointed.

Appleton, C. J., Cutting, Walton, JDaneorth, and Peters, JJ., concurred.