History
  • No items yet
midpage
Purcell v. Heeny
28 Ohio St. (N.S.) 39
Ohio
1875
Check Treatment
By the Court.

Independent of the provisions of section 557 of the Civil Code, as amended (67 Ohio L. 116), a vendee of real estate in peaceable and undisturbed possession, with covenants of general warranty, can not defeat a recovery by the vendor of the unpaid purchase-money, by merely showing that there is an outstanding title to an undivided part of the premises. In such case, to constitute

good defense to such'an action, the vendee must show an eviction or something equivalent thereto.

Under the remedial provisions of said amended section, the holder of such outstanding title, in the absence of such an eviction, is a necessary party to the action in order to make such a defense available, and the validity of such title must first be established before the vendee can have recourse on the vendor for the purchase-money, or before such defense becomes available to defeat its recovery.

The judgment of the common pleas and district court is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Purcell v. Heeny
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 15, 1875
Citation: 28 Ohio St. (N.S.) 39
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.