83 Ga. App. 803 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1951
One of the special grounds of the amended motion for a new trial alleged that the court erred in charging the jury: “If you should believe that there was a contract, and if you believe that the parties have settled this liability, if there was a liability, for attorney’s fees by mutual accord and satisfaction or in money paid and received in settlement of the liability, if there was a liability, then you would return a verdict for the defendant.” A defense of accord and satisfaction must be specially pleaded, and where a defendant fails to so plead, evidence
The other alleged errors in the court’s charge will not likely occur on a new trial of the case and are therefore not considered.
As the case is being reversed on another ground it is not necessary to rule on the general grounds of the motion for a new trial.
The court erred in charging the jury on accord and satisfaction and in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment reversed.