Psomatithis v. Transoceanic Cable Ship Co.Psomatithis v. Transoceanic Cable Ship Co.
Ordered that the appeal from the order dated April 19, 2006, is dismissed; and it is further,
Ordered that the order dated December 22, 2005, is affirmed; and it is further,
Ordered that the one bill of costs is awarded to the respondent.
An action dismissed pursuant to
The plaintiff‘s subsequent motion, denominated as one for leave to renew and reargue, was not based on new evidence that was unavailable to him at the time of the original motion. Thus, the subsequent motion was, in actuality, one for leave to reargue, the denial of which is not appealable (see Matter of Phillips v Goord, 16 AD3d 422 [2005]; Meehan v David J. Hodder & Son, Inc., 13 AD3d 593 [2004]). Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Krausman and Covello, JJ., concur.