*1 Case 2:25-cv-01083-TLN-JDP Document 12 Filed 06/18/25 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEPHEN FAVIS, Case No. 2:25-cv-1083-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiff,
v. ORDER
MICHAEL JOSEPH FAVIR,
Defendant. On May 9, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served Plaintiff Stephen Favis (“Plaintiff”), and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.
The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States , 602
22
F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.
23
See Robbins v. Carey , 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 24
magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”).
25
Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 26
the record and by the proper analysis.
27
///
28
*2 Case 2:25-cv-01083-TLN-JDP Document 12 Filed 06/18/25 Page 2 of 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed May 9, 2025, are adopted in full; 2. Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (ECF No. 4) is dismissed without leave to amend for
lack of subject matter jurisdiction; and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: June 17, 2025
2