75-3046 | 9th Cir. | Mar 20, 1978
571 F.2d 1132" date_filed="1978-03-20" court="9th Cir." case_name="Prune Bargaining Association v. Robert Bergland (Successor To Earl Butz)">571 F.2d 1132
PRUNE BARGAINING ASSOCIATION, a non-profit Cooperative
Association, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Robert BERGLAND (successor to Earl Butz), Secretary of
Agriculture of the United States et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 75-3046.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
March 20, 1978.
Reginald Steer, of Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, San Francisco, Cal., Bruce I. Cornblum (argued), San Diego, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Alexis Panagakos (argued), of Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendants-appellees.
Before DUNIWAY, WRIGHT and SNEED, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated by Judge Orrick in his Memorandum Opinion, Prune Bargaining Association v. Butz, N.D.Cal., 1975, 444 F. Supp. 785" date_filed="1975-05-21" court="N.D. Cal." case_name="Prune Bargaining Ass'n v. Butz">444 F.Supp. 785. We add only that the judge did, on motion for new trial, consider appellants' "Corrected Exhibit C." As to that exhibit, he said:
(S)o far as the newly discovered evidence goes, I think it's inconsequential, at best, the changes in the figures and irrelevant at the least.
(R.T. 198.)
He was right.
Affirmed.