Protest 942682-G of De Pompei

2 Cust. Ct. 620 | Cust. Ct. | 1939

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

On the record it was held that the wine press in question is manifestly a mechanical contrivance for utilizing and applying energy or force and is not an article having as an essential feature an electrical element or device. The claim at 27½ percent under paragraph 372 was therefore sustained.