Prospect Boiler Co. v. Bloomfield Clay Co.
78 N.J.L. 741 | N.J. | 1910
The questions raised in this ease are not sufficiently novel or doubtful to require particular discussion at our hands. We find no error in the record.
The judgment under review should be affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgu, Vroom, Gray, Dill, Congdon, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.