125 Ga. 406 | Ga. | 1906
1. The charge of the court in reference to the contract being in accord with the construction placed thereon by this court when the case was last here (121 Ga. 439), the grounds of the motion for new trial containing exceptions to the charge in reference to such construction are without merit.
2. A witness experienced in digging and constructing artesian wells having testified that the well in the present case would, in his opinion, produce
3. The evidence authorized the verdict. No errors of law were committed by the court, and a new trial was properly denied.
Judgment affirmed.