Pritchard v. Southern Company Svs., 92 F.3d 1130

ORDER:

Appellees’ Petition for Rehearing is denied except as to a modification of the last paragraph of our opinion clarifying the status of the individual officers of Southern Company Services, Inc. Part IV Conclusion is amended to read:

IV. CONCLUSION

We conclude that the District Court erred when it granted SCSI summary judgment under the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act. We REVERSE that part of its decision. We AFFIRM summary judgment in favor of SCSI as to the Title VII claim, and we also affirm summary judgment in favor of Don Welliver and Jeff Prince as to all claims.¹

^*Honorable John R. Gibson, Senior U.S. Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

¹Pritchard‘s remedy for any discrimination she may have suffered on account of her alleged disability lies against her employer, not individual officers of her employer. See Mason v. Stallings, 82 F.3d 1007, 1009 (11th Cir.1996).

Notes

1

Pritchard‘s remedy for any discrimination she may have suffered on account of her alleged disability lies against her employer, not individual officers of her employer. See Mason v. Stallings, 82 F.3d 1007, 1009 (11th Cir.1996).

Case Details

Case Name: Pritchard v. Southern Company Svs.

Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Date Published: Aug 28, 1996

Citations: 92 F.3d 1130; 95-6312

Docket Number: 95-6312

Court Abbreviation: 11th Cir.