History
  • No items yet
midpage
Prince v. Hammock
265 Ala. 255
Ala.
1956
Check Treatment

This is an appeal from a decree of the circuit court of Franklin County, in Equity, overruling a demurrer to the bill of complaint.

The appeal must be dismissed because the record fails to show the organization of the court as required by Rule 26 of the Supreme Court Rules, Code 1940, Tit. 7, Appendix (now Rule 24 of Revised Rules of the Supreme Court, 261 Ala. p. XIX et seq.). Such failure is jurisdictional and the court must take notice of it ex mero motu. West v. Camp, 264 Ala. 644,89 So.2d 170; Reynolds v. Henson, 264 Ala. 435, 87 So.2d 856; McPherson v. Stallworth, 262 Ala. 367, 368, 78 So.2d 924; Garrard v. State ex rel. Waid, 260 Ala. 486, *Page 256 487, 71 So.2d 59; Pensacola, A. W. R. Co. v. Big Sandy Iron Co., 147 Ala. 274, 41 So. 418.

Appeal dismissed.

SIMPSON, MERRILL and SPANN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Prince v. Hammock
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Sep 6, 1956
Citation: 265 Ala. 255
Docket Number: 8 Div. 776
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.