History
  • No items yet
midpage
Prince v. . Brooklyn Rapid Transit Company
220 N.Y. 610
| NY | 1917
|
Check Treatment

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN and CRANE, JJ. Dissenting: HISCOCK, Ch. J., and CARDOZO, J. *Page 611

Case Details

Case Name: Prince v. . Brooklyn Rapid Transit Company
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 6, 1917
Citation: 220 N.Y. 610
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.