Prigorac v. ParkPrigorac v. Park
In this dental malpractice action arising from a root canal performed by defendant, questions of fact are presented by the experts’ conflicting opinions as to whether defendant departed from the prevailing standard of care and, if so, whether such departure resulted in plaintiff‘s injuries; and also by the parties’
Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.