40 F. 174 | D.N.J. | 1889
The libelant sues to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by his canal-boat, T. A. McIntyre, by coming in contact with the fluke of the Sontag’s anchor on the 15th of February, 1888, under the following circumstances: Both vessels had been lying for several days in the Standard Oil-Dock, at Bayonne, in the state of New Jersey, with their bows pointing in the sanie direction, and their port sides securely fastened to the wharf by bow, breast, and stern lines. The Sontag was astern of the McIntyre, at a distance of not exceeding five feet. The bark, being loaded nearly to her full capacity, drew 20 feet forward and 19 feet aft. The canal-boat, having on board 243 tons of coal, drew 71
The libel charges negligence on the part of the Sontag in leaving her anchor suspended in the manner described, when, according to rule and usage, it'should have been carried at cat-head, or hauled in. The answer admits that the injury complained of was caused by the Sontag’s anchor, hut alleges that she had remained in the same place for several days, with her anchor hanging from the hawse-pipe, without doing any harm, and without complaint or notice to remove it, and that the anchor was promptly lowered on request. The answer also denies the existence of any rule or custom which requires the in-shore anchor of a vessel, moored as the Sontag was, to he catted or hauled in, and claims that the damage was caused primarily by the inattention of the McIntyre’s captain to the fastenings of his boat, which were allowed to become loose, and let her sag down on the Sontag’s anchor. There is no proof of negligence on the part of the canal-boat. She had taken her berth first, the Sontag coming in afterwards; and, if it was incumbent on either to keep at a proper distance from the other, that duty belonged to the hark, so long as the canal-boat remained stationary. The evidence does not show that there was any material change in the position of the McIntyre. The situation required some vigilance on the part of both vessels. When two vessels, moored at the same wharf, are lying so near to each other as these two were, there will be more or less play on their lines, with the rise and fall of the tide, and consequently some danger of collision; and it is the duty of each so to dispose of its tackle as to avoid injuring the other in case they come together. The Sontag was in fault by failing to perform this duty. The export testimony proves the general custom and usage to be that vessels moored at wharves or piers, as these were, must have their in-shore anchors catted, and the off-shore ones hauled in on the forecastle. Such also is the rule established by the board of harbor masters of the port of New York, (rule 9.) The custom is founded on sound prudential reasons, for mutual protection in case of collision; and