—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud, defamation, breach of contract, and tortious interference with a contract, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Connell, J.), entered October 2, 2001, as denied their motion to compel the defendants to produce certain documents in response to their discovery demands, and (2) so much of an order of the same court, entered December 26, 2001, as denied their motion for leave to renew the motion to compel.
Ordered that the orders are affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.
The Supreme Court properly declined to compel the defendants to comply with the plaintiffs’ request for production of documents created after the commencement of this action or relating to other casinos, since those documents are not material or necessary to the prosecution of the action (see Allen v Crowell-Collier Publ. Co.,
The plaintiffs’ motion for leave to renew was properly denied, since it was not based upon additional or material facts not offered on the prior motion that would change the prior determination (see Feldstein v Rounick,