| Iowa | Oct 24, 1884
The question certified to us by the circuit court, and by which we acquire jurisdiction of the appeal, is as follows;
“Where an appeal has been taken from the. judgment of a court of a justice of the peace by the plaintiff therein to a circuit court, and defendant in the circuit court makes a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the amount in controversy in the justice’s court, as shown by the pleadings therein, is less than twenty-five dollars, and said motion is sustained, can the circuit Court, on sustaining said motion,
The claim made by counsel for appellants is that, as the circuit court had no jurisdiction of the appeal, no judgment can legally be entered against the surety in the aj>peal bond for the amount of the judgment rendered by the justice of the peace.
Section 3580 of the Code provides that no appeal shall be allowed until a bond is taken and filed in the office of the justice, and “if the judgment be affirmed, or .if on anew trial the appellee recovers, or if the appeal be withdrawn or dismissed, judgment shall be rendered against the principal and surety in the bond.” Other provisions of the statute provide that, upon an appeal being taken, all further proceedings before the justice shall be suspended, and if an execution has been issued it shall be recalled by a certificate from the justice of the peace that an appeal has been allowed. And the justice is required to file the original papers in the case, and a transcript of his docket entries, in the office of the clerk- of the circuit court. Section 3954 provides that “any judgment in the circuit court against the appellant shall be entered up against him and his sureties jointly.”
The case is this: Can a party take an appeal and suspend a judgment, and make costs in the circuit court, and, when judgment is rendered against him and his surety upon its being ascertained that he had no right to appeal, resist such
Tbe court had jurisdiction to examine tbe record before it, and dismiss tbe appeal, or affirm tbe judgment of tbe justice. It cannot be claimed that the circuit court did not have jurisdiction to render a judgment upon the appeal bond for the costs which accrued in the circuit court. It would be a most singular state of affairs, if a party who invokes tbe jurisdiction of a court is not liable for tbe costs, when it is ascertained that tbe court has no jurisdiction.
Appeal bonds are for the security of appellee, and for tbe protection of the appellant against the judgment, pending the appeal. If plaintiff’s position be correct, a party may have an appeal allowed when he has no right to appeal, and, after the delay caused by the wrongful proceedings, be and the surety on the bond may insist that tbe bond is void.
We do not think that this position is sound. Under sections 3580 and 3594 of tbe Code, above cited, the court, upon dismissing an appeal, may render a judgment against tbe appellant, not only for tbe costs which accrue in tbe circuit court, but for tbe amount of tbe judgment before the justice of the peace. And, if this may be done, section 3594 imperatively requires that any judgment entered up against the plaintiff shall be against him and bis sureties jointly.
We have not considered the question as to tbe right of tbe surety to appeal to this'court. It appears «from the record that both tbe plaintiff and tbe surety appealed.
Affirmed. •