Prefontaine v. Roberge
39 A. 758 | R.I. | 1898
We think that the defendant's exceptions relating to the allowance by the auditor of moneys paid by the plaintiff on the joint account of himself and the defendant, on the ground that such moneys were not mentioned in the declaration, were well taken; but we think that the plaintiff may be permitted, on motion, to amend his declaration in respect to the sums allowed.Spicers Peckham, v. Harvey,
