History
  • No items yet
midpage
Prater v. State
224 So. 2d 679
Ala. Ct. App.
1969
Check Treatment

Prater was indicted and convicted of falsely pretending to Paul Brown with intent to defraud that he owned an inventor's patent, etc. The trial judge fixed his punishment at three years imprisonment.

The State over objection which was overruled, introduced an uncertified copy of letters patent. The heading noted Prater as "assignor to P. A. B. B. Incorporated, Meridian, Miss."

In its uncertified form this document was hearsay. Code 1940, T. 7, § 432 provides in pertinent part:

"As an additional or alternative mode of proof, the following documents may be proven as follows: * * *

*Page 79
"9. Documents in the departments of the United States government, by the certificate of the legal custodian thereof."

The admission of this document was prejudicial and requires a reversal of the judgment of conviction. We forego consideration of how the State can prove as of the period November 11-December 2, 1964 (the span of time covered by Brown's payments to Prater) that the letters patent (if certified) were still under assignment to a person other than Prater.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed and the cause is there remanded for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Prater v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 17, 1969
Citation: 224 So. 2d 679
Docket Number: 4 Div. 691
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.