History
  • No items yet
midpage
Powers v. Theofel
226 A.D. 696
N.Y. App. Div.
1929
Check Treatment

Order reversed upon the law, witn ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion the action may be maintained. (Brown v. Cole, 54 Misc. 278; Cummings v. Bailey, 53 id. 142; affd., 120 App. Div. 892.) The record shows that the amended rules of the Democratic county committee of Queens county were not adopted by a majority of that committee as required by section 15 of the Election Law. They are, therefore, invalid and their enforcement may be enjoined. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Seeger, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Powers v. Theofel
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 15, 1929
Citation: 226 A.D. 696
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.