96 Wis. 487 | Wis. | 1897
The deed evidently was intended to express the entire agreement of the parties on the subject to which the action relates. It is entirely clear by the deed itself that the defendant was to pay the whole cost of the improvement in front of the premises he purchased. This is clear without considering the disputed words. Such -words did not change
By the Court. — The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.