History
  • No items yet
midpage
Powers Regulator Co. v. Tocci
231 N.E.2d 19
Mass.
1967
Check Treatment

The final decree from which the general contractor, Tocci, appeals in this suit brought under G. L. c. 149, § 29, by the plaintiff subcontractor (Powers) established the indebtedness of another defendant subcontractor (KimbaÚ) to Powers, ordered Kimball to pay the indebtedness, and provided that if Kimball should fail to pay, Tocci should pay, and if Tocci should fail to pay, then the surety should pay the established indebtedness to Powers. *750In form and content the decree followed the suggestion in Powers Regulator Co. v. Joseph Rugo, Inc. 348 Mass. 233, 234. The decree was based upon a confirmed master’s report. There was no motion to recommit and no request for a summary of the evidence on which the master’s findings were based. The motion to strike the report was inappropriate. Respro, Inc. v. Worcester Backing Co. 291 Mass. 467, 472. The master’s findings are not mutually inconsistent or plainly wrong and they support the decree.

Barry W. Plunkett for the defendant Loreto F. Tocci. Thomas L. Mackin for the plaintiff.

Decree affirmed with costs of appeal.

Case Details

Case Name: Powers Regulator Co. v. Tocci
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Nov 3, 1967
Citation: 231 N.E.2d 19
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In