History
  • No items yet
midpage
Power v. Woolley
21 Ark. 462
Ark.
1860
Check Treatment
Mr. Justice Fairchild

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff Woolley declared on a note executed to him, but in the note, a copy of which is set out in the declaration, his name is spelled Wolley.

Power demurred for the variance between the names, the demurrer was overruled and judgment given for the note— Power appealed,, staying the execution by recognizance of himself and securities.

There is no variance properly pleaded, and there is none to plead.

Let the judgment be affirmed, with ten per cent, damages and costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Power v. Woolley
Court Name: Supreme Court of Arkansas
Date Published: Jul 15, 1860
Citation: 21 Ark. 462
Court Abbreviation: Ark.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.