History
  • No items yet
midpage
Power v. Rees
189 Pa. 496
Pa.
1899
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

The opinion of the learned court below contains a very satisfactory statement of the reasons why a verdict for the defendant was directed by the court. It is not necessary to enlarge upon these reasons. It is quite enough to know that when the defendant had allowed a period of fifteen years to elapse, without filing a bill for a settlement of the partnership dealings, he certainly cannot be permitted to set up the want of such proceedings as a defense in the present action. We are entirely satisfied with the opinion of the court on the motion for a new trial, and on it we affirm the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Power v. Rees
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jan 3, 1899
Citation: 189 Pa. 496
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 130
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.