midpage

Powell v. Trans-Auto Systems, Inc.Powell v. Trans-Auto Systems, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
May 12, 1969
Versions:32 A.D.2d 650
300 N.Y.S.2d 747
1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4034

Order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated June 12, 1968, affirmed, without costs. This third motion by plaintiff for summary judgment was properly denied. The practice of making successive motions for summary judgment, each based upon new factual assertions and proofs which were available to the movant from the outset, is to be discouraged (cf. Levitz v. Robbins Music Corp., 17 A D 2d 801). In any event, there are present issues of fact as to plaintiff’s contributory negligence. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Martuseello, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Powell v. Trans-Auto Systems, Inc.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 12, 1969
Citations: 32 A.D.2d 650; 300 N.Y.S.2d 747; 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4034
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In