*1 Case 8:04-cv-02587-JDW-EAJ Document 27 Filed 06/02/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 100
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION LORETTA M. POWELL,
Plaintiff, VS. Case No. 8:04-CV-2587-T-27EAJ MMG TRANSPORTATION INC. and
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY PUBLIC
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION,
Defendants.
ORDER
BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiffs "Pro Se Appellant Motion for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis" (Dkt. 19) and Defendant MMG Transportation's Response (Dkt. 20).' Upon consideration, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs motion (Dkt. 19) is DENIED. Plaintiffs motion is construed as a motion for reconsideration of this Court's April 11, 2004 order, which denied Plaintiffs motions for entry of clerk's default. Plaintiff filed her complaint on November 30, 2004. (Dkt. 1). Both Defendants were served with the complaint on February 2,2005. (Dkts. 9, 10). MMG's answer, filed on December 2 1, 2004, was timely. (Dkt. 5). Likewise, Hillsborough County's motion to dismiss, filed on February 22,2005, was timely.2
DONE AND ORDERED in chambers this /zfday of June, 2005. ~nihdd States District Judge Copies to:
Counsel of Record
' Hillsborough County joined in MMG's response to Plaintiffs motion. (Dkt. 22). In accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 6, the day that the defendants were served is not included in the computation of defendants' time to respond. Accordingly, a response to the complaint was due on February 22, 2005.