History
  • No items yet
midpage
Poundstone v. Maben
5 Colo. App. 70
Colo. Ct. App.
1894
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

This case was brought up with the preceding one of Poundstone v. Holt, ante, 66, and while of necessity two records were filed, both cases were treated and argued as one, though separate judgments must be entered. If the record in the present case may be treated as containing all the matters exhibited by that filed in the preceding cause, the same judgment must consequently be entered. For the reasons expressed for the affirmance of the judgment in the preceding cause, this will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Poundstone v. Maben
Court Name: Colorado Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 15, 1894
Citation: 5 Colo. App. 70
Court Abbreviation: Colo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.