midpage

Pound v. PleisterPound v. Pleister

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 5, 1931
Versions:153 A. 907
107 N.J. Eq. 577

This is an action for specific performance and the learned vice-chancellor dismissed the bill of complaint, from which decree so advised the complainant below appeals.

Without going into details it is sufficient to say that we conclude that the opinion of this court in Lennig v. OceanCity Association, 41 N.J. Eq. 606, is controlling and for that reason the decree below is affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DALY, VAN BUSKIRK, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Pound v. Pleister
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Feb 5, 1931
Citations: 153 A. 907; 107 N.J. Eq. 577
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
Log In